Ck2 is orthodox good. If your starting intrigue is very low .

Ck2 is orthodox good Plus, if you form an empire and vassalize the pope, you get a lot of benefits. I actually want to go Orthodox, I’m just worried if, like in CK2, Catholicism is just an objectively better faith than Orthodoxy. - Orthodox just like in CK2: just one religion with one overall religious head (Ecumenical Patriarch) - Regional autocephalous patriarchs like Ck2, each being the religious head of the faithful in their area. There are objective goals and activities, as most 4xs have. Things that are core to CK3, like the stress system and there being an incentive to role play, are It's harder and easier in certain ways. CK2 with and without DLC is a pretty huge difference. 2) In terms of how different it is - I know there Welcome to the ck2 community. The processor, in more Stellaris is more mechanically a game than CK2 is. I'm leaning towards Peaceful/Civilized+Stability/Temporal, seems like a good combo for neutering my faction-happy vassals, with plenty of opportunities for expansion with imperial reconquest, county conquest, claim wars and the eventual Immortal Blood of Alexander bloodline. Then rush to end the Schism and conquer the rest of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. preferably This way you get 2 kingdoms for yourself and a good capital in Rome. CK3 has better foundations, looks better, easier, better UI, better combat, and will constantly be updated. Depending on your learning stat, you might have more options, and might be I took Rome from the pope in order to make myself the new pope of my heretical Catholic sect, and I think I might have bugged him a little. It requires the Holy Fury DLC. If people are converting to Mormonism in the HCC during a Wildfire Reformation, Orthodoxy is not out of the picture. So what does the Orthodox faith shine in? Is it a good faith or just worse version of Catholicism Yeah it really annoyed me in CK2 until I saw it like that on the mod, seemed hugely unhistorical but it’s hard to model in the game I think (the mod had to have both catholic and orthodox as “chalcedonian”, with every character having a trait that said “Latin or Greek rite”, and then an event tree leading up to 1054 and the split) I quit playing before Sons of Abraham came out and I recently got back into CK2. Pure Heavy Infantry might be good in CK3, but Why does the CK2 wiki, on the Great holy war page, list the Orthodox as having a Crusade Weight if they lack a Crusade Mechanic? It seems odd that the Jewish, who can declare such a war, lack any weight at all while the Orthodox, who cannot declare a crusade, have the code in place to call a crusade upon their foes. More posts you may like r/CrusaderKings. Is the GTX760 no good for this game in particular? I'm getting very good results for other games, like Skyrim, and am quite confused. I noticed that only the war screen (participants and enemies with war score) down right appeared, the patruarch didn't call any if us before to jointhe crusades and no cross appeared under . ; Jewish rulers may receive Ashkenazi or Sephardi courtiers to their realm (). One of things I loved about Crusader Blade is it forces you to stop monotyping. Unique decisions: Judaism was really strong in ck2 because you could cough cough cough click the decision a million times to stack the religious enemy buffs totally by design and not a glitch What makes orthodoxy so good? Im a rusaian orthodox in my CK3 has the better art style and UI, its not even close. The vanilla reformed Slavic pretty much sucks, Orthodox is better. From a gameplay stand point, Catholicism is certainly the superior religion because if Catholicism is vastly superior to Orthodoxy, especially after vassalizing the Pope. My problem is they are always good Also, another way to get good people into your court is to marry your courtiers. The church officially cuts all ties with the character, causing major diplomatic issues. I have a four duchy Brittany in ck2 that can challenge France, England, and many of the other larger A good time to start is just before the real-world Fourth Crusade (1202) - the Angelos have a few possible candidates. [CK2] Title Names Overhaul: A mod that overhauls the names of several titles, societies and more. I respond to negativity too eagerly. CK2 with DLC still has a lot more content, flavor, and mechanics. We only got a “mend the Great This mod makes title grants much more immersive. To answer the question in your tittle: the reason is because, when CK2 launched with its earliest start date of 1066 and its rigid religion system, the split between Catholicism and Orthodox was obvious (thank you, @DukeLeto42 for the 1054 date so I didn’t have to google it). I was wondering if I should ever revert back to Orthodoxy, or if staying Iconoclast CK2 it feels like there's always a good number of things to be working towards, and a good balance of curveballs it'd throw at you to keep things interesting without making it feel like you got no control. Although, early-game if you prefer starting weak, Germanic is the top-tier choice, due to Orthodoxy really only has autocephaly. [CK2] Help Literally none. Even worse, I sometimes have an imbecile/clubfooted child born to a genius mother and a strong father. I think its pretty fun though. Join the Community of Saint Basel (or other Christian Monastic Society if you are not Orthodox Muslims are followers of Islam, one of the 6 religious groups represented in Crusader Kings II. Assyrian is in a similar boat in CK3, and it's Byzantine as well. Personally I love the history of the Orthodox Church, but I found there to be so few flavour and mechanics The main advantage of Orthodox is that pretty much everyone gets their own anti-pope with no negative downsides. Muslim non-nomadic rulers are playable with the Sword of Islam DLC. I think that decisions affecting entire societies is a good idea, but that one isn't. So, may be a good idea to grab for a The odds of a good outcome depend on how many modifiers you get from previous events. I'm trying just to make turkey right now and just keep it that way. The issue with CK3 is that paradox sucks and likes to rerelease the predecessors features as new DLC. Ck2 has so many little features that add up and make the game feel alive. Orthodox and Catholics are not technically infidels. rather than estimating this through piety alone. Generally, playing as a Muslim trades stability for better control of your traits and gene pool. As per the title how does one change from Iconclast to Orthodox? Thanks Easy. The religions with Good Tier - 1066 and 867 are very, very good start dates, but kind of pale in comparison to most of the competition. Ck2 is better if you want to develop within your borders rather than expand them. Also, so far the one major difference I noticed is that my head of faith is poor at all times, so I can't keep asking for gold. I have played CK2 a lot, and just started this mod today. When you get good at ck2, you will be beyond an expert in ck3. SBolshevik Something Something Aŋrômainiiuš Press his claim and win (good look with that!), ERE is Catholic now 5. It's been 100 years, and Iconoclasm has set roots in both France and Italy, and there are nearly no believes of Orthodoxy. However, Nordalbingia was part of Frankish domains This subreddit contains opinions of Orthodox people, but not necessarily Orthodox opinions. they are led by a Prelature, a layman, and I don’t think its overlooked, I think it’s not finished yet. 0 unless otherwise noted. Yeah but an orthodox Russia is the only way to go. Reassign kingdoms to the local or the Ecumenical Patriarch, pass agnatic laws, closely control the Ecumenical Patriarch, crusade, declare other Christians heretics, a dynamic holy order and more. The scope and expectations should obviously be higher. But the fact that it is new means This is a legitimate question based on CK2 content history, Vanilla launched with barebones shared Christian events + a rigid Pentarchy system that doesnt allow for things like asking another patriarch to exommunicate someone regardless of how bad that character is, because your character follows a different Patriarch. CK2 is a better strategy game than CK3. CK3 is easier to learn and play, is much better looking, and has a couple of nice new features. Slime99 Major. Meanwhile Catholics have the most holy orders of any religion, and If you are not Holy Fury reformed Slavic. Only one of those can be true and the other is false. Invade! Toggle signature. I might even spare those willing to convert for a bribe. The Fourth Crusade is unique because the Eastern Orthodox generally were considered schismatic and not heretics, which is why the Venetians were excommunicated for attacking them. I was aware William's claim to the English throne was in large part bolstered by the support of the Pope, and that the Pope(s) of the time were hugely energetic figures stamping their I second you on the Berber trade republic. Oh of course, if you have a claim it's totally possible. As u/KhetdaNight said it does a lot of balancing, to expand though, it overhauls the decadence system (no longer a percentage, but rather based on traits), seduction is nerfed considerably and a slightly changed map that is pretty similar to the basic CK2 map. playing as Hellenic Byzantine is like Roman Horde. Autocephaly (from Greek "self-headed") is the status of a hierarchical Christian church whose head bishop, while still in full communion with the church, does not report to any higher-ranking bishop. Doing the immortality chain unsuccessfully tends to leave your character a mess, dead, or reincarnated, which can ruin an otherwise succeeding campaign. Being catholic (or even orthodox/iconoclast) is way more challenging with this start because, well, your moral authority is going to be below ground level most of the time, but that only adds a T&T was a good DLC and arguably even CK2 would want that one, but the others are so mid. That said, Orthodox is a good contender for weakest religion. Reply reply For fun, which Orthodox Chirstian Church are you part of (or attending as a catachumen) comments. Ck2 has more stable succession for the player but warfare is definitely harder. 3. In Christianity, Iconoclasm has generally been motivated by people who adopt a literal interpretation of the Ten Commandments, which forbid the making Past AAR (CK2): Ivar the Bönless, The Bönnie Prince, The First Few Completed Iron Century AAR (CK2): Thankmar's Rebellion Previous stealth AAR (V2): Seventeen. It is great at king level, but if you have vassal kings they'll have their own patriarchs. Even once who hit empire stage, Catholicism is barely better than Orthodox until you hit the vassalize the pope end game. Report. The only things that In this moment CK2 has the advantages. Having two separate Christian religions is crucial to the balance of CK2. ). [CK2] Reduced Court Size: A minimod focused on removing useless courtiers to improve performance. Don't do that until you're ready to sacrifice your tribal pagan bonuses. Exercise caution in forums such as this. And within a few years, Iconoclast was dominant throughout the empire. Orthodoxy needs indeed more in depth representationin both ck2 and ck3 it looks more like catholic without all the good stuff as already mentioned. Then, sometime after the In ck2 I’ve taken married women and go ced them to be concubines/wives and I want to say I’ve taken female rules and don the same It’s been a while since I’ve done a Norse run on ck2 so I’m not totally sure So basically i feel like yeah ck3 has better mechanics and things like that but it doesnt have the grittines of ck2 or the feel. it's not even hard, as if Caesar himself is reborn on earth. Holy orders can also operate as independent rulers, constructing castles and waging their own wars. I know it had taken some systems from the CK2 DLCs and made them part of its core game, but would it be worth playing it now as it is or waiting for a few more DLCs to drop I'll then comb through it using free duchy-vice-royalty revocation, revocation plots, intrigue focus spying and good old fashioned assassination to replace those heretic greeks with trusty Italians. Content should not be treated as a substitute for offline interaction. CK3 in its current state is good but once you get to a certain point it just feels so empty since they haven't really added mechanics. The +30% holding taxes and the farmland make it good economy-wise, also +15% taxes for all holdings in the duchy (which also applies to Constantinople, making it a +45% tax bonus), the huge garrison and the very high fort level make it very hard/long to siege down. That said, 1. What make wariorblodge good? Only Christian way to do it is orthodox. Crusader Kings 3 is building off of CK2 at the end of its run. I was wondering if I should ever revert back to Orthodoxy, or if This is the reworked version of Stronger Orthodox Church. May 3, 2017 762 ck2 I’ve read up on the differences of both and how they affect the game in theory on the wiki page. Oh, and with the subscription it would take five years of subbing to pay for all packs. College of Cardinals, Orthodox Pentarchy and specific seas for kingdom tier titles, functional crusader AI, Actually stable Islamic powers, non-Viking adventurers, and so much other stuff Depends on what you're looking for. Ok, I could send my Brother (Im emperor) to China even though my brother seems to love me. Members Online • Aprilprinces . as a major influence, with the complications of investiture conflicts, anti-popes, additional free holy orders, etc. CK2 is different. Ck2 should be the best strategy game ever. These Orthodox Christians, made up a large proportion of the garrison troops that defended cities and towns after they were conquered by the Crusaders. It's much better than Catholicism early on unless you start as an empire or a kingdom that's ready to form one. get elected basileus, form a Wow that's not a bad history take I'd ever heard before. As much as I loved CK3, for new player CK3 is much better (it's still complex but easier to understand). Its literally called Crusader Kings for fucks sake. A thing I've seen explained by people who do game design and game design criticism is that randomness is rarely a good way to increase difficulty. CK2 is a sandbox primarily, you play a character, not a nation. If you already have CK2 and don't want to spend another billion dollars on Paradox, then CK2 is good alternative. Sainthood is a mechanic available to Christians and reformed pagans who adopt the Ancestor Veneration doctrine during reformation. Shouldn't need to hold holy sites to convert to a living religion. Administrator is easily A/S tier, and the easily best lifestyle because of the Respected ruler modifier, and Game Master/Socializer can The first two Mongol hordes, the Golden Horde and the Ilkhanate, can convert to the Catholic, Orthodox, Nestorian, Sunni, or Shia religion by a special event. < > Showing 1-8 of 8 comments I don't play Christians much but I vaguely recall older versions of the game not letting you call religious wars on the Orthodox. The ability to raid as a trade republic is great as well, because you destroy the trade post in a county upon successful raiding siege of a holding, allowing you to clear out trade posts belonging to CK2 made me understand the hysteria around cults . I'm getting a constant message as the eastern roman empire after a successful crusade Orthodox is a no hassle religion that gives you a personal anti pope for free once you form a kingdom. Maybe start on the ottoman empire but not yet. The question remains however, if I should convert to Catholicism or remain Iconoclast/reinstate Orthodoxy. But in terms of how CK3 handles being a ruler, and relationships, it’s light years ahead. Eh CK2 with all its DLC is undoubtedly a more fleshed out game. In Russian lands after 1066, Jul 28, 2023 Either go Messalian or adopt an Orthodox Heresy and make it the new Orthodoxy. The main advantage to being Orthodox, is that if you're a king, you should be able to appoint your own patriarch (religion head) and you control the excommunications within your realm. 867 would be the best time to reform the Germanic faith if 769 didn't exist, and it's still an amazing start date if you want This is CleanSlate's original goal. CK2 makes each nation feel unique and the features are extremely abundant. Unless you want to mend the schism, it is almost always better to pick a different faith. So is CK2 good? Merchant republics, nomads, Byzantine mechanics, societies, viceroyalties, trade routes including inland trade routes (silk road and trans-Saharan trade routes), China interaction, ambitions, smaller playable government types (monastic feudal, Chinese imperial), in-depth pandemics/disease system, council voting and council laws, tributaries, random or shattered What mods do you recommend for an enhanced vanilla experience? So far i played mostly with only CK2+ and a few minor ones like university I wanted maybe to get more events, RP immersion and expanding the romance and Excommunication is an act of censure by a religious head. Still worth doing? In terms of their mechanics, clearly Catholicism in CK2 is superior to the Orthodoxy. Every time I think of playing more CK2, I remember all of the faults Paradox left in first, such as the text being broken or the last wills being bugged, or the special troops being broken to the point that future updates were sorta "balanced" around the brokenness but not quite. I play with just a couple DLCs and am about to go to 200 hours (got ck2 last month lol. CK2 I am messing eith the game files, and specifically the religions. They may be OP in EU4, but that does not mean they should not have more content in CK2 The Pope just called a Crusade on the Byzantines to reclaim Greece from the "blasphemous Orthodox". Now all Catholic holy orders are Orthodox, and you can vassalize the Knights Templar and the Knights Hospitaller by decision. Content is available under Attribution-ShareAlike 3. But as Orthodox tribe your dont have any good sides plus you loss 60% defense bonus of Pagan. I'm sure people that haven't played CK2 wonder how a simulation like this How to get good diplomats? (CK2) Help Another question to the emperors here, At the button intrigue, I can get new vassals to my court. 4 is best, 2 is the minimum to increase good outcome odds (1 is the same as 0). CK3: warfare: capturing enemy leader is easier than in CK2, CK3: buildings: not so much different from CK2, but now limited slots, and maybe higher boni for every stage (better than CK2) I was a superfan of ck2, but on release, ck3 was a bit bare and a bit crap. For example, it doesn't do nearly as good of a job at making you feel like you're playing an actual character. Catholic becomes an Orthodox heresy from mending the schism. All the people are now fully 3D modeled and actually look good, as opposed to ck2's disgusting portraits. . Though I still prefer to make a Cathar Russia. sure, such as Russia's deeply Orthodox religious history) and were motivated solely by Communism Its not a silly comparison at all the scope for CK2 was very small at the beginning. I don't care about the secret orthodox people, seriously find the guys that keep sacrificing my generals to Satan please and thank you. As a Catholic emperor you'll most certainly want to vassalize the Pope. Even something like a new outfit takes time that CK2 never needed to worry about because of it's simple graphical style. The only thing in the realm of possibility is for the big successful Orthodox Christians (Russian empire for example) to come and aid Byzies if Constantinople is under threat When I first bought CK2, I was most intimidated by picking my character. the leader of the Golden Horde starts as Orthodox, so the Mongols immediately splinter and try to kill you. had a habit of trying to mend the great schism. I downloaded CK2+ and picked the sultanate of rum when it was first formed which is around 1066 and started playing that tonight and holy crap is it tough. However, in ck2, only the Byzantine have this ability should that be changed? to the Philippians where he scorned That's good to know I guess, even though I have never done this before. ; About Crusader Kings II Wiki; Mobile view Hey guys, long time lurker on r/ck2 but I've been meaning to post this guide. Since your domain counties are in the floodplains, focus all your income on building and developing. Is there even a glimpse of hope for the faith in CK3? The closest non-catholic branch that’s good is Nestorian because it doesn’t deal with autocephalous Next, convert to Orthodox, either before you get Crusaded or before you lose one. but when you give titles to such characters, Orthodox because its a chad legit religion instead of the heretic iconoclastic heresy and to prove that orthodoxy will reign supreme regardless of how many extra features the game gives to the catholics Are Varangian Veterans that good? Fellow CK2 veterans, is CK3 worth getting? Holy orders are bands of troops that can be hired with piety to fight religious enemies. 0 E What Could Have Been. The good outcomes are: The character will have discovered a new star, and has to choose between naming it after himself, a child, his wife or a friend. txt, where I have turned crusades ON for the Orthodox. Namely high republic or range. CK2 blows CK3 out of the water in terms of immersion and roleplay. If you're starting in 769, own at least one orthodox province (most of the empire is orthodox), click on the county icon to where it comes up "county of so and so" and right click on the county logo and there should be a button that says "secretly convert to orthodox". Holy war against orthodox/iconoclast states? I've recently acquired "Monks and mystiques" doc and it seems to me that one of the changes is the fact that I no longer can wage as a Catholic ruler a holy war on states like in the title Am I right or is it just my deluded memory that After mastered CK2 in so many ways , I've been searching for a new good game to play but I couldn't find one. How? Since September we are on Year 5 of CK3 Yeah, I’ve always liked playing with Russia and have enjoyed the orthodox bonuses. Hindu gives CCR and that’s pretty cool if you don’t have natural CCR, but it’s very strong if you reach 90% CCR along with abso, because it allows you to reduce the coring time to the magical number of 9 months. I think CK2 does a very good job of showing the relative ease of travel on the Mediterranean compared to having to march all the way across Europe and the fact that the eastern steppe is pretty unimportant until giant hordes of nomads pop up. Yes, I've seen the Looks like your income is good, but it could probably be better. It depends. Reforming Slavic paganism isn't a bad idea either. Any vassal bishop of duke or higher is effectively a Orthodox Pope (the In most starts before the Latin Empire start, the most powerful Orthodox state by far is the Byzantine Empire, but Georgia and Bulgaria are also formidable. So you want to be immortal, first thing I found when searching online is "Its so rare, 1% chance to get it" etc. The map has two whole extra layers of detail now, for example in CK2AGOT, The Arbour was a single county, in CK3AGOT The Arbour is a duchy with a fuck ton of counts in it who in turn have their own, on the map, barons (which I belive with a What is the difference between the Greek Rite and the Byzantine Rite? I had +1 health for being strong, family focus and a "mild" illness, followed up with a successful experiment which, in total, brings the on-screen health aggregate to -1. So now it seems like we're destined for years of middling, EU4 style "let's add a few crumbs of content to this region" indefinitely. It is available for most branches of Christianity, and for the Yazidi heresy of [CK2] Original Portrait Frames: A minimod that restores the pre-Horse Lords portrait frames. The holy wars against catholics are great for taking the balkans back (fuck you serbija), and I personally think iconoclasm is better than orthodoxy (icons are bad), so I go iconoclast. Ck2+ is largely gameplay balancing mechanics and fluff. Also I'm definitely going to create a heresy at some point, but for the first couple of hundred years I'm going to stick to a mainstream faith. Ck2+ is more "fun" if you like a ahistorical ck themed stuff and want the game to be harder / less broken to shit and mechanically exploitable. Most religions only have one holy order; only Catholics have multiple orders. One poster said religion in CK3 was 'bland' compared to CK2. playing as Orthodox and trying to restore Roman Empire is Orthodox or Catholic you are still the "Emperor of the Romans" or "agustus" or whatever. You shouldn't be excusing its current state because its better than a 10 year old game. The argument that gameplay mechanics, such as the Evangelical Church similarity to vanilla Orthodoxy mechanics-wise, make Orthodoxy irrelevant isn't valid, since that was the old justification against Islam being added. Plenty of good mods, tons of content and DLC, and pretty entertaining in its own right. As for the Orthodox faith, your pope is the Ecumenical Patriarch, and he's who you ask for claims and excommunications and the like. Just experience-wise, unless the Empire does already have a very strong Emperor that will put up a serious challenge, combined rebellious vassals (You'll face independence factions in the ERE'S core lands due to culture/religious issues, as well as claimant factions, assuming you're french catholic) often The Russian Empire is somewhat challenging one to play as. Definitely worth it in my opinion if you like ck3. Yeah when I played CK2 I hoped that any sequel would have a better character design/portrait system. For the full extent of the mod, I’d suggest one of the unique gov types. and hopefully that is good enough " - Snow Crystal, 2018 "Don't quote me on that though. It's just not a lot of fun to die because a die roll said you Instead of giving Orthodox some benefits, you get a mechanic that turns every catholic into an orthodox, plus catholics lose the ability to crusade irc. For you pros out there can you tell me if I'm right? In short it seems CK3 gives you too much control So the orthodox version of catholicism within mexico is Cristo Rey, which we have to be a lay order that gained a lot of power post-event because of the chaos and the IRL shortage of priests. The problem is that gameplay for CK2 ended up so built around these mechanics, that they couldn't have got away with omitting them from 3. No, the DLC was CK2's DLC tended to flesh out an area, but also add universal mechanics. It is a frequent component of major political or religious changes. In the original version of CK2 it didn't exist because it had happened 12 years before Also, note that the exact odds of failure depends on the artifact tier you commissioned the smith for. OP, you have a good path to conversion laid out: take an Orthodox prisoner while raiding, make her concubine, optionally make her your wife, convert to her religion. Declare a war to get a border with Byzantium, swear fealty, convert to Orthodox Greek and get elected emperor and congrats, you only need to get a few more duchies CK2Plus (CK2+) is a mod originally created by Wiz, a member of the Something Awful forums who began working for Paradox in January 2013, which was then completely overhauled by a new team following the release of the Rajas of India DLC. The Iconoclasms didn't last because of widespread dissent among the Orthodox clergy at the time and the Latin Rite also condemning it back when they were on friendlier terms. I usually choose to invade Lombardy because they are Christian and ti's so annoying to expand in Europe when you are orthodox. 15 Badges. Start a Random World with all possible settings set to ‘Random’ and play for 200 years. The dlc for it mostly It's probably a good decision on Paradox's part to just leave him out and avoid any potential controversy altogether (especially given the current climate of Sweden and Europe in general), but if the game were played in Mohammed's time (and therefore making him actually relevant beyond the bloodline traits) I would absolutely mod in an actual Yeah, Orthodoxy loses Ecumenism from the same decision that gives it to the Iconoclasts - it's kind of ridiculous. I had a really successful run where I reformed Rome and revived Hellenism. But in practical terms and own gameplay style, which do you prefer to play as? I've seen a lot of people bashing CK3's religious system and saying CK2's was better. Then, you swap to Catholic and turn it into the dominant faith, making the Orthodox holy order transfer. When you invade someone, you can siege down all the top holdings of his realm and you will CK2 with must be DLCs cost more the CK3. I figured it wasn't a bug but I wanted to make absolutely So I started at the Charlemagne bookmark (769 I think?) as the Byzantine Empire, Iconoclast emperor. ; Missionaries: Like other organized religions, Jews can send out missionaries to pagan realms. Not even orthodox crusades. It's way more fun to play hellenic than orthodox at this point. This keeps repeating game after game and I don't know what to This page was last edited on 11 March 2014, at 21:21. 1) In terms of how complete the game is - keep in mind how CK2 was at the release (you could only play as Christian kings, dukes and counts, the differences between Catholic and Orthodox weren't as detailed, etc. I was wondering which characters have the most events and potential. You can start the game as an Irish count, and end as the Italian King of Greece potentially. At one point you write that there is nostalgia filter for CK2, and at the other hand that there hasn't been any improvement on CK3. Late game EU4 features a fuckton of rebelling and fighting, but late game CK2 is no more bloodthirsty than midgame to me. They just want to convert to Orthodox. It can give Deceitful ; either Cynical or Paranoid ; and a good chance of Diligent . The first crusade is a good example of this. The issue with autocephaly. I've recently seen a number of posts mentioning that 769 start in CK2 is a mess. I've recently upgraded my computer to 16gb ram, intel core i7, a GTX760 and a Windows 64bit OS. Frankly I've never seen a good Even Orthodoxy has more to it than the Armenian and Coptic faiths, which is a bit sad, though to be fair much of the Orthodox flavour focuses on the Byzantine Empire. It's completely unrealistic to expect CK3 to get DLC as fast as CK2 did. But hellenic is much cooler anyway Orthodox, there are many benefits for being Christian in CK2 Reply reply Top 1% Rank by size . Vanilla CK2 still has all of the patches, so it is a very good functional game. I Paradox Forum. But this happens in 876 aswell unless Asturias has a good game. I don't think anyone would want to deal with early crusades where the then technically Catholic Byzantine Empire puts a stomping on your ass every game. The mod has had a lot of new features added since its original inception and continues to be updated regularly. While the AI would need a very good reason to ask the Pope to join the Crusade, such as living right next to the region where the Crusade is going, hoping to take some land from it, like the I am interested in the game, but I am wondering what differences there are and how complete the game is. Ask to the Pope the right the Empire 6. Finally you can get some alliances! It is easy from here. I I love CK2 and still enjoy grinding out some of the achievements on the game or some of the mods that are available, but just wondering if it's worth giving CK3 a go. He's unlanded, but I can't find him anywhere on the map, even when he's waging Crusades against even then, Hellenic is just erasing that tedious "forging claims" steps. Nothing should be regarded as authoritative without verification by several offline Orthodox resources. The game also has 3D models, which adds a whole new layer to any DLC pack that's going to be adding anything to the character models. Good to know though. Angioletta would soon reach her majority, as her mother prepared a slightly different investiture ceremony for her eldest, and inviting a healthy, young, Orthodox Croat to be her Building an observatory can get you lots of tech points. It makes for a good capital. r/CrusaderKings Conversely, EU4 leads to more fighting. I just began playing CK2, and I noticed that, in 1066, Denmark owns all of Holstein; that is, the counties of Nordalbingia and Wagria. So maybe grab a few dlc when that drops if you have a few Having watched a few little video clips I must say I prefer the adult artstyle of ck2 (it is like a 'proper' historic war artstyle) to the 'cutesey' style of ck3 (although the character effects like the red face for drunkard and getting obese are funny, hehe). They did a really impressive job with it, especially considering how the early concept art looked like an updated version of the CK2 portraits (which wouldn't have been terrible but the current design is a massive improvement). The Khagan must be unreformed Tengri and not Zealous. Now, if you're further afield The lifestyle choices for this is kinda random all since it doesn't take into attached indirect bonuses. I'll start with the kingdoms with the most Orthodox holy sites to speed things up. Because it was originally a negative event (a chance to have a failure causing additional costs instead of paying for an improved item), the odds of your smith "failing" get larger with the item tier 40/60/10 (before modifiers) for T3 -> T4, 60/40/10 for T2 -> T3, and They have different goals in mind at least re HIP and Ck2+ HIP wants historical accuracy (simulation) content primarily over gameplay fixes. Reply reply From what I can tell, it was more like the old roman style, where rich landowners and possibly really successful businessmen used their money and connections to land Christianity is one of the 6 religious groups represented in Crusader Kings II, and the only group playable without paid expansions (though its mechanics are expanded So many years after the release of CK2 and we got no updates for the orthodox faith. But for the Chalcedonian Christians I think its good to have well established faiths like Roman Catholic or Orthodox otherwise it could become a bit weird I guess. Through good works and self-purification, the character can potentially achieve local sainthood. Jewish rulers have access to the Holy War casus belli. Reply reply xGobblez • It's alright. Islam has several mechanics not found in other religions and requires unique strategies. Yes, they get "Religious Difference" penalties in relations, but because they are so similar and were divided in the Great Schism they don't get the Holy War CB UNLESS the Byzantine Emperor restored the Great Schism, in which case Catholicism becomes a heresy, thus becoming a valid Holy War target. 5. The Both good CK2 has a lot more stuff though you have to buy all the dlcs to the get the full thing while CK3 has a lot of stuff from CK2 (and improved it) and is more "noob" friendly compared to CK2, though if i have to pick which one I like the most it will be CK2, mainly because of the way i play and because i feel CK2 handle Crusades, combat Reforming a pagan faith is fun and all, but getting claims on other kingdoms though mairrages is difficult due to different religion penalties. Never Surrender! My Mods: All i wanna add is conversation to Orthodox was a not very good idea. After the death of a pious character, there is a chance for them to be beatified by the Pope (if Catholic), Patriarch (if Autocephalous), or a local bishop (if other Christian denomination). So logically following, Coptic in CK3 should be Byzantine, Once you have Alexandria, rush to take Rome immediately (you should have the CB lined up and ready to go) and just restore the Pentarchy. As if that wasn't enough, guess who's gonna visit you somewhere CK2 wiki’s Roman Empire page is still using the pre-Holy Fury map and doesn’t accurately portray the borders needed for SPQR. Whenever I raise the CK2 in-game speed to 4 and above, it constantly stutters, and this is very irritating. Havnt ever played orthodox in ck2 Thanks! Yeah me too, if I'm honest I am the most casual of players, and am nowhere near as good at this game Starting as a Greek count in Brendesion, I can slowly but surely inch my way up Sicily and then Italy. I quit playing before Sons of Abraham came out and I recently got back into CK2. Crusader Kings is a historical grand strategy / RPG game series for PC, Mac, Linux, PlayStation 5 & Xbox Series X|S developed & published by Paradox Development Studio. I somewhat enjoy the HRE game in Vanilla so was thinking of trying the Holy Columbian Confederacy (plus I have a lot of Southern Family and find it a beautiful area), and also am studying French so want to try someone in Quebec, but I am fine with PS. All script has been updated to use newer script features where applicable, and inefficient and/or hard-to-comprehend script has been optimized, and where necessary, documented. l played for hundreds od hours and still it doesnt immerse me nearly as much as ck2 (for example if im playing ck2 hours fly by i start at 11 pm and 30 mins later it is 5 am ,but in ck 3 i am acutely aware of the time beacuse it is less immersive and i know im Iconoclast works just the same as orthodox in the base game iirc, and after only a few decades, most of your starting territory will be iconoclast. CK2+ is mostly concerned with improving and expanding gameplay. If your starting intrigue is very low Seems there is a contradiction to your post. y icon. Thus I have several suggestion on how it can be represented in the game in a way to correspond wiht the medieval era orthodoxy. D Seems like a good way to give my sons a kingdom (or two How can I change my duchy from slavic pagan to ORthodox? This would be similar to reforming a religion, except that you can personally interact in the council (through event chains) and shape what Christian sect becomes the new orthodoxy. The entire point of a secret society is that you can do your shit And Coptic was a culture in CK2, and it was Byzantine there. There should be a sale when holy fury comes out mid next month from what I've heard. In about fifty years, you'll have a realm that's strong enough to take down the Orthodox Christianity-Pros: the historical option, already a reformed religion, will allow for easier transfer to feudal, will allow for holy wars, available alliance with the Byzantines Rurik is considered the easiest start for good reasons, but Paradox hates Russia, a fan-made continuation of the original After the End mod for CK2 and The DLC almost completely changes the game, though IMO not in a good way. Orthodox gained Both the Catholic and orthodox leaders, in early and middle medieval history, had a habit of trying to mend the great schism. The ruler designer alone adds a ton of replayability A bit of a weird question, but I'm pretty skeptical as in CK2 Orthodox felt like a bastardized version of Catholicism. Judaism is an organized religion in its own religious group (Israelite), along with its heresies (Karaite and Samaritan). The event chain is predictable, pretty safe, and can get you several good traits. The Duke of Manhattan is popular since he’s a high republic, americanist (poster boy faith in the game), and in a decent starting spot. Then you swap again to Cathar and make it the Im wondering if the orthodox church can call crusaders or something? like Catholics have crusaders and Muslims have Jihadsdo orthodox have crusades? Paradox Forum. You start with 0 kingdoms, and half of your ground is under infidels. Reply reply At least it works that way in ck2+, I don't remember if it worked that way in vanilla Reply reply Orthodox must suffer in CK2 so it can live in EU4. ] What would be different from CK2 is: - Autocephaly is not automatic and is acquired. Am I right? I am new to CK and I actually think CK2 is a better strategy game. Putting all the Non-Chalcedonians into one group is a big nono in my book however. Orthodox had the Pentarchy, autonomous patriarchs, and schism-mending Iconoclasm is the deliberate destruction within a culture of the culture's own religious icons and other symbols or monuments, usually for religious or political motives. " - MrFreake_PDX, 2020. I played about 10-20 hours and it never really hooked me. 1. Also, balance, CK2 is already in a good position I'd say (I only hate 769 becouse north is getting dominated by germanic pagans, south by tengri) while CK3 I assume (! I really don't know, just basing on how Paradox makes their games) still needs a lot of attention before really having each and every option be a good pick. or is it pretty much a flavourless religion like it But bear with me here. Have you ever wondered how characters in CK2 hate you for being a foreigner, a foreign conquerer, infidel, heretic etc. Surprisingly, this event chain is very good for improving your intrigue skill. Unless you already fully upgraded your capital and all ya want is reformed religion to get into Feudal, then its okay. So that woman you just invited with 19 diplomacy, marry her matrilineally to a high CK3: duchies can have their own inheritance laws, good thing CK2 : all holdings have the same law as the highest title, save kingdoms under an empire. It also Gives you +2 Learning per piety, which is incredibly good. This turn Catholicism into a heresy of Orthodoxy, and will turn the Catholic rulers Orthodox in the space of a few years. That said, since you're in scandanavia instead of the British isles, you're in a good position to reform the faith. r/CrusaderKings. Here are the starts I had the most fun with. Here’s my Pros/Cons: Catholic Pros: Can potentially get help with holy wars Crusades Carolingian Blood gives Catholic opinion None of my children inherit good traits. Personally I love the history of the Orthodox Church, but I found there to be so few flavour and mechanics compared to the other religions that it seemed so lackluster and lame (especially compared to Norse). You wrote that CK3 right now is better game than CK2 was at it's end. Any event series that turns all of the historically Orthodox land orthodox would be quite a messy affair indeed. I recall in CK2 pure archer retinues we're the best composition for several releases until they balanced it. Orthodox used to be the absolute best religion in the game, but now it’s just very good, not the best anymore. Reply. pbhx bjx zmg fndd fmijfd mrfg wvvrw zfpx wxv ryjgwdg